William R. Schleter

Teaching

Teaching History Summary

I started at UT in 1997 with a half-time assignment of coordinating engineering graphics classes. A few years later those classes were combined with others into a sequence of two 6 hour integrated freshman engineering classes that combined graphics, programming, physics, and design, and I became involved with all aspects of those classes. The subsequent evolution of those class into the current set of core classes that are required of all freshman engineering students happened in 2005, and I was heavily involved in that development as well. I co-developed all materials for the two physics classes (EF 151 and EF 152) and I have completely developed the two computer classes (EF 105 and EF 230). In 2014 I fully implemented an online version of EF 230 that ran concurrently with normal sections. I've also been involved in an effort to implement more hands-on activities such as programming robots and arduino microcontrollers to supplement the traditional teaching of programming in EF 230.

I don't know what is considered a standard teaching load, but I'd venture to guess that the number of students that I'm responsible for is relatively high compared to most faculty, and all this while also spending a significant amount of time on support tasks. As shown by the data below, I have worked with almost 13,000 students over the past 15 years. My ratings in the lecture environment have always been very high. The ratings for the lab classes are lower, but those classes represent an entirely different environment in which I prepare the material and assignments while graduate teaching assistants present the material and interface with the students.

If you are viewing this document online, the links on the charts provide access to the course web sites and the raw data behind the evaluation numbers. This data includes students' free form comments. If you view the EF 151 data you'll see that, for a class this size, there is a very positive feedback from students and that my ratings are identical to those of Dr. Richard Bennett, a 30 year veteran with numerous teaching awards. In addition, the students overall enjoy the true team teaching style that we've developed. This style and approach not only keeps the students attention better in lecture, but the implicit benefits of having two people involved in every aspect of the class leads to redundancy, better decisions, and fewer things forgotten - all important factors in delivering a quality class to a large number of students.

Lecture Classes

Classes People EF
Survey2,3
SAIS, ECE4 Grade
Dist2
Semester Courses1 Fac/GTA Students 1 2 3 4
Spring, 2022 EF 151 1/1 101  
Fall, 2021 EF 151 2/7 575  
Spring, 2021 EF 151 2/4 204  
Fall, 2020 EF 151 3/8 589  
Spring, 2020 EF 151 2/3 164  
Fall, 2019 EF 151 3/10 705  
Fall, 2019 FY s12 1/0 15  
Spring, 2019 EF 152 3/9 490  
Fall, 2018 EF 152 2/3 150  
Fall, 2018 FY s12 1/0 23  
Spring, 2018 EF 152 2/8 469  
Spring, 2018 ME 470 1/0 58  
Fall, 2017 EF 152 2/3 151  
Spring, 2017 EF 152 2/8 499  
Fall, 2016 EF 152 2/3 159 4.2 4.5 4.5 4.6 4.5
Spring, 2016 EF 151 2/3 211 4.3 4.2 4.3 4.3 4.2
Fall, 2015 EF 151 3/9 597 4.5 4.2 4.1 4.3 4.2
Spring, 2015 EF 151 2/3 214 4.4 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.2
Fall, 2014 EF 151 3/8 560 4.3 4.1 4 4.2 4
Spring, 2014 EF 151 2/3 192 4.4 4.1 4.2 4.2 4.1
Fall, 2013 EF 151 2/7 506 4.0 3.7 3.7 3.8 3.7
Spring, 2013 EF 151 2/2 182 4.4 4.2 4.2 4.3 4.1
Fall, 2012 EF 151 2/6 453 4.4 4.1 4.2 4.2 4.1
Spring, 2012 EF 151 2/2 161 4.6 4.2 4.2 4.5 4.3
Fall, 2011 EF 151 2/3 409 4.4 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.2
Spring, 2011 EF 151 2/6 136  
Fall, 2010 EF 151 2/6 440  
Spring, 2010 EF 152 2/5 296  
Fall, 2009 EF 152 2/2 143  
Spring, 2009 EF 151 2/3 160  
Spring, 2009 EF 152 2/5 344  
Fall, 2008 EF 151 2/5 420  
Fall, 2008 EF 152 2/3 134  
Spring, 2008 EF 151 2/3 159  
Fall, 2007 EF 151 2/5 334  
Spring, 2007 EF 151 2/3 158  
Fall, 2006 EF 151 2/5 342  
Spring, 2006 EF 151 2/3 176  
Fall, 2005 EF 151 2/7 289  
Spring, 2005 EF 102 5/20 377  
Fall, 2004 EF 101 4/22 505  
Spring, 2004 EF 102 5/22 313  
Fall, 2003 EF 101 7/24 395  
Spring, 2003 EF 102 7/26 358  
Fall, 2002 EF 101 8/29 464  
Spring, 2002 EF 102 6/27 383  
Fall, 2001 EF 101 7/29 485  
Total Students: 14648
  1. Course materials for all semesters of all classes are available via the links above.
    EF 151 - (4 credit lecture/lab) - Physics for Engineers I
    EF 152 - (4 credit lecture/lab) - Physics for Engineers II
    EF 101 - (6 credit lecture/lab) - Engineering Approach to Physical Phenomena
    EF 102 - (6 credit lecture/lab) - Fundamentals of Engineering Mechanics
  2. All ratings based on EF Surveys (~90% response rate)
    EF scale 1 (very good) to 5 (poor) converted to SAIS scale 5 (very good) - 0 (very poor)
  3. Lecture Evaluation Question: "Rate the overall quality of Prof. Schleter's effectiveness in presenting the material."
    If the rating is linked, the link shows a page with all the student responses.
  4. Fall, 2016 the university switched from SAIS to ECE. The numbers shown are the weighted average for these 4 ECE questions: 1 (contribute), 3 (responsive), 4 (respectful), 5 (feedback)

Lab Classes

Classes People EF
Survey2,3
SAIS Grade
Dist2
Semester Courses1 Fac/GTA Students 1 2 3 4
Spring, 2016 EF 230 2/3 145 mentor  
Fall, 2015 EF 230 2/4 306 mentor  
Spring, 2015 EF 230 2/3 165 mentor  
Fall, 2014 EF 230 1/4 283 3.5 na na na na
Spring, 2014 EF 230 1/3 131 3.4 na na na na
Fall, 2013 EF 230 1/4 238 3.1 2.8 3.1 2.8 2.9
Spring, 2013 EF 230 1/3 140 3.8 3.6 3.8 3.7 3.7
Fall, 2012 EF 230 1/4 216 3.5 3.4 3.5 3.5 3.3
Spring, 2012 EF 230 1/3 121 3.9 3.2 3.3 3.1 3.1
Fall, 2011 EF 230 1/3 177 3.3
Spring, 2008 EF 105 1/4 166 3.4
Fall, 2007 EF 105 1/4 416 3.0
Total Students: 2504
  1. Course materials and ratings are available via the links above.
    EF 105 - (1 credit lab) - Computer Methods in Engineering Problem Solving
    EF 230 - (2 credit lab) - Computer Solution of Engineering Problems
  2. All ratings based on EF Surveys (~90% response rate)
    EF scale 1 (very good) to 5 (poor) converted to SAIS scale 5 (very good) - 0 (very poor)
  3. Labs were developed and coordinated by me and taught by GTAs.
    Lab Evaluation Question: "Rate the overall quality of the class."